<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FM Reception Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-radio/fm-reception-guide/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amfmreception.com</link>
	<description>Ultimate tuners, receivers, hardware, software, and antennas guide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:36:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AM FM TV Reception Guide and Directory &#187; Secrets of FM Reception</title>
		<link>http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-radio/fm-reception-guide/comment-page-2#comment-7921</link>
		<dc:creator>AM FM TV Reception Guide and Directory &#187; Secrets of FM Reception</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-reception-guide/#comment-7921</guid>
		<description>[...] FM Reception Guide    Categories [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FM Reception Guide    Categories [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-radio/fm-reception-guide/comment-page-2#comment-7307</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 02:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-reception-guide/#comment-7307</guid>
		<description>I live in a fringe area in the middle of Arizona.  I could not receive FM on my Harmon Kardon which is the center of my house audio system.  I was able to pull in FM on my 30 year old Sansui 2000 though.  

I bought the FM dipole recomended, installed in the attic (1 1/2 story) and use the Sony XHD-FM tuner.  I now can receive several stations previously unattainable.


A cheap solution.  thanks for the great website.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in a fringe area in the middle of Arizona.  I could not receive FM on my Harmon Kardon which is the center of my house audio system.  I was able to pull in FM on my 30 year old Sansui 2000 though.  </p>
<p>I bought the FM dipole recomended, installed in the attic (1 1/2 story) and use the Sony XHD-FM tuner.  I now can receive several stations previously unattainable.</p>
<p>A cheap solution.  thanks for the great website.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-radio/fm-reception-guide/comment-page-2#comment-6470</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 13:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-reception-guide/#comment-6470</guid>
		<description>in regards to Hashem Noyes on FM reception with the new fluorescent lights it is due to the electronic switching ballast transformers I recommend when installing new fluorescent lights that you seek out the the type of forest lights that have the transformer style ballast transformers rather than the switching type ballasts sincerely George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in regards to Hashem Noyes on FM reception with the new fluorescent lights it is due to the electronic switching ballast transformers I recommend when installing new fluorescent lights that you seek out the the type of forest lights that have the transformer style ballast transformers rather than the switching type ballasts sincerely George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sime</title>
		<link>http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-radio/fm-reception-guide/comment-page-2#comment-5445</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-reception-guide/#comment-5445</guid>
		<description>Hello, 
I recently purchased a vintage Accuphase T-100 in marvelous condition wood case and all.
It was up for sale in a local buy and sell for a what I thought was a very reasonable price.
I wasn&#039;t looking for a tuner it simply was a impulse buy more so then anything else. 

After listening to it for extended periods I&#039;m now hooked on FM broad cast&#039;s.

My question concerning this vintage tuner is getting a proper antenna for it including coax cable.
My tuner has a 75ohm antenna connection on the back, would the RG6 coax cable be compatible with this 75 ohm connection?
Perhaps the RG6 is 75ohm also?

Thank you.

Mark Sime

&lt;em&gt;Hi Mark,

You are exactly right, RG6 is 75 ohm and will work perfectly for your new radio.

It is a good one that you&#039;ll enjoy!

Best,
Lake&lt;/em&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
I recently purchased a vintage Accuphase T-100 in marvelous condition wood case and all.<br />
It was up for sale in a local buy and sell for a what I thought was a very reasonable price.<br />
I wasn&#8217;t looking for a tuner it simply was a impulse buy more so then anything else. </p>
<p>After listening to it for extended periods I&#8217;m now hooked on FM broad cast&#8217;s.</p>
<p>My question concerning this vintage tuner is getting a proper antenna for it including coax cable.<br />
My tuner has a 75ohm antenna connection on the back, would the RG6 coax cable be compatible with this 75 ohm connection?<br />
Perhaps the RG6 is 75ohm also?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p>Mark Sime</p>
<p><em>Hi Mark,</p>
<p>You are exactly right, RG6 is 75 ohm and will work perfectly for your new radio.</p>
<p>It is a good one that you&#8217;ll enjoy!</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Lake</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Stahl</title>
		<link>http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-radio/fm-reception-guide/comment-page-1#comment-2882</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Stahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-reception-guide/#comment-2882</guid>
		<description>Sorry George
 I finally figured out where your reply was. Please disregard the last message. Thanks so much for the info.

MIke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry George<br />
 I finally figured out where your reply was. Please disregard the last message. Thanks so much for the info.</p>
<p>MIke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Stahl</title>
		<link>http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-radio/fm-reception-guide/comment-page-1#comment-2881</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Stahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-reception-guide/#comment-2881</guid>
		<description>I have a problem which I don&#039;t believe there is a solution to. Is there any way to block a 91.3 FM signal which is coming 45 miles from the South and pick up a 91.3 FM signal coming 120 miles from the North?

I have about 150&#039; of RG6 cable coming from a Radio Shack FM antenna on the North side of a hill 30&#039; in the air. I have a Radio Shack DC block at the antenna with an 110v Radio Shack booster at our Bose radio. The 150&#039; RG6 comes into the attic which is connected via adapter to a heavy duty 300 ohm 30&#039; flat cable running to the radio. I have not tried replacing the 30&#039; of 300 ohm cable in the attic with RG6 yet. 

For the past couple of years this has been acceptable even thought the 91.3 from the South would drown out the 91.3 from the North every so often. About three weeks ago the North signal went away after some bad weather and all we could pick up was the South signal. I thought possibly I had a bad connection due to weather, but all connections were in excellent condition. Every so often the North signal comes in, but is always over powered by the South signal. I did contact the radio station to the North and inquire as to if any changes in their signal strength had happened. The engineer I spoke with was very surprised that I could pick up his signal 120 miles from the station. He also said that normally his signal was good for 60 miles max, but there were a few instances of listeners receiving a signal at 80 miles. If there was some way I could block the South signal I probably could pick up the North signal. Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.

Thank You
Mike Stahl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a problem which I don&#8217;t believe there is a solution to. Is there any way to block a 91.3 FM signal which is coming 45 miles from the South and pick up a 91.3 FM signal coming 120 miles from the North?</p>
<p>I have about 150&#8242; of RG6 cable coming from a Radio Shack FM antenna on the North side of a hill 30&#8242; in the air. I have a Radio Shack DC block at the antenna with an 110v Radio Shack booster at our Bose radio. The 150&#8242; RG6 comes into the attic which is connected via adapter to a heavy duty 300 ohm 30&#8242; flat cable running to the radio. I have not tried replacing the 30&#8242; of 300 ohm cable in the attic with RG6 yet. </p>
<p>For the past couple of years this has been acceptable even thought the 91.3 from the South would drown out the 91.3 from the North every so often. About three weeks ago the North signal went away after some bad weather and all we could pick up was the South signal. I thought possibly I had a bad connection due to weather, but all connections were in excellent condition. Every so often the North signal comes in, but is always over powered by the South signal. I did contact the radio station to the North and inquire as to if any changes in their signal strength had happened. The engineer I spoke with was very surprised that I could pick up his signal 120 miles from the station. He also said that normally his signal was good for 60 miles max, but there were a few instances of listeners receiving a signal at 80 miles. If there was some way I could block the South signal I probably could pick up the North signal. Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.</p>
<p>Thank You<br />
Mike Stahl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Hackett</title>
		<link>http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-radio/fm-reception-guide/comment-page-1#comment-2228</link>
		<dc:creator>George Hackett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-reception-guide/#comment-2228</guid>
		<description>Live in 94590-3714 area code.  Many AM and FM stations, both local and distant.  Want to order the outdoor 1/2 Wave Dipole FM antenna and was wondering if I could use it for AM reception as well, have an older NAD7240 tuner.  Anything special needed to accomplish this?  Thanks for the help!

&lt;em&gt;No, the half-wave dipole is FM only. There is an AM Reception Guide located elsewhere on this site that discusses AM reception. Reception on AM is a completely different creature from FM so I&#039;m not going to cover it here to avoid confusion other than to say it is rarely necessary to mount an AM antenna outside.

R,
Lake&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Live in 94590-3714 area code.  Many AM and FM stations, both local and distant.  Want to order the outdoor 1/2 Wave Dipole FM antenna and was wondering if I could use it for AM reception as well, have an older NAD7240 tuner.  Anything special needed to accomplish this?  Thanks for the help!</p>
<p><em>No, the half-wave dipole is FM only. There is an AM Reception Guide located elsewhere on this site that discusses AM reception. Reception on AM is a completely different creature from FM so I&#8217;m not going to cover it here to avoid confusion other than to say it is rarely necessary to mount an AM antenna outside.</p>
<p>R,<br />
Lake</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-radio/fm-reception-guide/comment-page-1#comment-2206</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-reception-guide/#comment-2206</guid>
		<description>I live in the 19711 zipcode.  I have an Onkyo Cr-305TX tuner/CD player and get most excellent FM reception using the rabbit ear antennae I had sitting in my parts box. Way better than running twin lead up the wall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in the 19711 zipcode.  I have an Onkyo Cr-305TX tuner/CD player and get most excellent FM reception using the rabbit ear antennae I had sitting in my parts box. Way better than running twin lead up the wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick M.</title>
		<link>http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-radio/fm-reception-guide/comment-page-1#comment-2203</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-reception-guide/#comment-2203</guid>
		<description>Many thanks for your very helpful and useful site!  I have 2 questions: First, my office is in a very tall building (Sears Tower in Chicago) that has oodles of antennae on its top.  Not unexpectedly, FM reception in my office is not easy.  But I notice that cheap FM radios, with no antennas at all, seem to do better than my vintage HK FM receiver, for which I have tried a variety of indoor antennas, with dubious success (reception comes and goes).  Why is that -- and what can I do about it (other than buying a simple FM radio).

My second question.  At home I am using a very high quality FM receiver (Naim) connected to a Fanfare antenna in the attic.  Reception on one of the stations I listen to most (Classical) is loud and strong -- but badly garbled or &quot;fuzzy.&quot;  Another receiver elsewhere in the house (a Nakamichi mini) does much better using the same antenna (via a splitter) even tho the coax run is considerably longer.  (Note that I had the same problem when there was a TV roof antenna -- removed and destroyed by the contractor that redid our roof.)

Your help would be most appreciated!

&lt;em&gt;Hi Dick,

Thanks for the questions, they are thought-provoking.

First,  with the HK receiver, if it works ok at other locations, which I question at this point, then you may try it with no antenna or with a small piece of wire, like speaker wire, just pushed into the hole for the antenna to see if you get any signal and the results are the same. If there are transmitters on top of the Sears Tower they could be blanking out your reception. Basically, you are saying that &quot;lesser&quot; receivers pick up what your &quot;better&quot; receiver will not so either the HK is defective or it is very succeptible to the near-field RF on the building. I&#039;m sure there are tuners that work in your setting. If you can open the cabinet of your tuner perhaps you could line the inside with foil (make CERTAIN NOT TO GET THE FOIL NEAR ANY OF THE ELECTRONICS so as not to short anything or to start the Great Chicago Fire of 2009 because you would not want to be a 21st century Mrs O&#039;Leary&#039;s cow) to prevent RF leakage. You could determine if RF was leaking into the case by wrapping it in aluminum or tin foil, thicker the better) and if that helps try to just block certain parts and if that helps you could then tape it inside with the unit unplugged and keeping the foil clear of the components. Just some thoughts. There are radios that work in high rf areas so you may have to make a change and do some additional research on radios for that need and the FM Tuner Group, of which I lurk but rarely participate, is a fantastic resource for such a thing but as with any board, be sure to measure the responses you get to any questions posted.

With the second question, here is what I would do. I would swap the receivers long enough to see if the results are consistent at both locations. If the Naim sounds the same in both locations, then the problem (whatever it is) is with the Naim. If the problem switches to the Nakamichi then you have a problem with your coax or the splitter because we know it isn&#039;t the antenna as it happened on two different ones. You can unplug and switch the two outputs on the splitter to determine if it is the splitter. This way you can determine where the issue lies and either replace the coax run from the switch to the Naim or replace the switch if it is the problem.

With both questions, if you determine the problem lies within the tuner, you either need to replace it, use it somewhere where it works correctly, or ask a tuner/receiver repair person what needs to be done. You may also pose your question on the FM Tuner message board on Yahoo to see if anyone else had the same problem with their tuner(s) like that.

Regards,
Lake&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks for your very helpful and useful site!  I have 2 questions: First, my office is in a very tall building (Sears Tower in Chicago) that has oodles of antennae on its top.  Not unexpectedly, FM reception in my office is not easy.  But I notice that cheap FM radios, with no antennas at all, seem to do better than my vintage HK FM receiver, for which I have tried a variety of indoor antennas, with dubious success (reception comes and goes).  Why is that &#8212; and what can I do about it (other than buying a simple FM radio).</p>
<p>My second question.  At home I am using a very high quality FM receiver (Naim) connected to a Fanfare antenna in the attic.  Reception on one of the stations I listen to most (Classical) is loud and strong &#8212; but badly garbled or &#8220;fuzzy.&#8221;  Another receiver elsewhere in the house (a Nakamichi mini) does much better using the same antenna (via a splitter) even tho the coax run is considerably longer.  (Note that I had the same problem when there was a TV roof antenna &#8212; removed and destroyed by the contractor that redid our roof.)</p>
<p>Your help would be most appreciated!</p>
<p><em>Hi Dick,</p>
<p>Thanks for the questions, they are thought-provoking.</p>
<p>First,  with the HK receiver, if it works ok at other locations, which I question at this point, then you may try it with no antenna or with a small piece of wire, like speaker wire, just pushed into the hole for the antenna to see if you get any signal and the results are the same. If there are transmitters on top of the Sears Tower they could be blanking out your reception. Basically, you are saying that &#8220;lesser&#8221; receivers pick up what your &#8220;better&#8221; receiver will not so either the HK is defective or it is very succeptible to the near-field RF on the building. I&#8217;m sure there are tuners that work in your setting. If you can open the cabinet of your tuner perhaps you could line the inside with foil (make CERTAIN NOT TO GET THE FOIL NEAR ANY OF THE ELECTRONICS so as not to short anything or to start the Great Chicago Fire of 2009 because you would not want to be a 21st century Mrs O&#8217;Leary&#8217;s cow) to prevent RF leakage. You could determine if RF was leaking into the case by wrapping it in aluminum or tin foil, thicker the better) and if that helps try to just block certain parts and if that helps you could then tape it inside with the unit unplugged and keeping the foil clear of the components. Just some thoughts. There are radios that work in high rf areas so you may have to make a change and do some additional research on radios for that need and the FM Tuner Group, of which I lurk but rarely participate, is a fantastic resource for such a thing but as with any board, be sure to measure the responses you get to any questions posted.</p>
<p>With the second question, here is what I would do. I would swap the receivers long enough to see if the results are consistent at both locations. If the Naim sounds the same in both locations, then the problem (whatever it is) is with the Naim. If the problem switches to the Nakamichi then you have a problem with your coax or the splitter because we know it isn&#8217;t the antenna as it happened on two different ones. You can unplug and switch the two outputs on the splitter to determine if it is the splitter. This way you can determine where the issue lies and either replace the coax run from the switch to the Naim or replace the switch if it is the problem.</p>
<p>With both questions, if you determine the problem lies within the tuner, you either need to replace it, use it somewhere where it works correctly, or ask a tuner/receiver repair person what needs to be done. You may also pose your question on the FM Tuner message board on Yahoo to see if anyone else had the same problem with their tuner(s) like that.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Lake</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry Gess</title>
		<link>http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-radio/fm-reception-guide/comment-page-1#comment-2200</link>
		<dc:creator>terry Gess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amfmreception.com/fm-reception-guide/#comment-2200</guid>
		<description>Hi Lake -- Got it, thanks. Now on to RG6 Coax -- how does a person determine good coax from less quality coax? I&#039;m estimating that my run for FM antenna will be considerably less than 75 feet, or at least in that ball park.

&lt;em&gt;Terry,

Great question! Thanks for that, so many people don&#039;t get how important the coax part of the reception system is and I appreciate you asking that. Some of this is touched on in the FM Reception Guide.

Generally, if it is manufactured to be used with satellites such as Dish Network or DirecTV it is good. Another indicator is if it is marked quad-shield RG6 then it is usually good stuff and I&#039;m not familiar with &quot;bad&quot; or &quot;imitation&quot; quad-shield mainly because it would EASILY be discovered by anyone that attaches a connector because you can see the shielding on it; point being that if it says quad-shield, it is the best. Name brands are also very good and I&#039;m sure there are plenty of good ones but Belden and Andrew come to mind but there are tons of others and if you looked online or did search for a brand name then I feel you would be fine. Also, if you purchase from a reputable dealer you won&#039;t go wrong. Also, if you are only going 20 feet then any RG6 will do and easily up to 40 or 50 feet probably but I can be an excessive person and as I find quad-shield to not be much of a hit financially I just go with it from the jump. The coax is the opposite of the antenna in a way as the antenna is a signal gain point and the cable is a loss point in the simplest description so as you want as much &quot;gain&quot; or signal entry as possible you want as little loss with the coax (or cable) as possible. With coax a smaller number is better; 2db coax is better than 5db because that is the loss rating. I don&#039;t recommend RG11 or RG11 quad-shield but for very, very long runs (200 feet total) as it is probably overkill but I have used it in the past and it is strong as well. Finally, try to keep the coax run as short as possible. If you could mount your tuner on the pole next to your antenna you would be set!

Again, along those same lines height is the key, so you accept the cable loss and do what you can to lessen it by using larger cable but the higher the FM antenna is mounted, the better it will work with few exceptions (though there are some rare ones).

Best,
Lake&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lake &#8212; Got it, thanks. Now on to RG6 Coax &#8212; how does a person determine good coax from less quality coax? I&#8217;m estimating that my run for FM antenna will be considerably less than 75 feet, or at least in that ball park.</p>
<p><em>Terry,</p>
<p>Great question! Thanks for that, so many people don&#8217;t get how important the coax part of the reception system is and I appreciate you asking that. Some of this is touched on in the FM Reception Guide.</p>
<p>Generally, if it is manufactured to be used with satellites such as Dish Network or DirecTV it is good. Another indicator is if it is marked quad-shield RG6 then it is usually good stuff and I&#8217;m not familiar with &#8220;bad&#8221; or &#8220;imitation&#8221; quad-shield mainly because it would EASILY be discovered by anyone that attaches a connector because you can see the shielding on it; point being that if it says quad-shield, it is the best. Name brands are also very good and I&#8217;m sure there are plenty of good ones but Belden and Andrew come to mind but there are tons of others and if you looked online or did search for a brand name then I feel you would be fine. Also, if you purchase from a reputable dealer you won&#8217;t go wrong. Also, if you are only going 20 feet then any RG6 will do and easily up to 40 or 50 feet probably but I can be an excessive person and as I find quad-shield to not be much of a hit financially I just go with it from the jump. The coax is the opposite of the antenna in a way as the antenna is a signal gain point and the cable is a loss point in the simplest description so as you want as much &#8220;gain&#8221; or signal entry as possible you want as little loss with the coax (or cable) as possible. With coax a smaller number is better; 2db coax is better than 5db because that is the loss rating. I don&#8217;t recommend RG11 or RG11 quad-shield but for very, very long runs (200 feet total) as it is probably overkill but I have used it in the past and it is strong as well. Finally, try to keep the coax run as short as possible. If you could mount your tuner on the pole next to your antenna you would be set!</p>
<p>Again, along those same lines height is the key, so you accept the cable loss and do what you can to lessen it by using larger cable but the higher the FM antenna is mounted, the better it will work with few exceptions (though there are some rare ones).</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Lake</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
